Please find the original article posted on Anthropoliteia. This posting does not mean that I´ve taken up the blog again!
Like most football fans across the world, I
have taken a perverse and personal delight in watching the bloated, jowly
patriarchs of FIFA fall, one after another. Not only do I feel that the
on-going investigations into the misogynistic world of backslapping, ham-handed,
wink-wink deal making are confirming my own knowledge and intuition, but also
that the doors to the smoky back rooms of FIFA have been prised open, exposing
a global coterie of sycophants and their clever, intertwined, and illegal schemes.
For the last six years, I have been investigating how the hosting of
the World Cup and Olympics impacts upon urban and social relations in Brazil.
In this work, I have exposed how the intricate shell
game of FIFA and the IOC extracts maximum wealth from host cities and
countries while at the same time militarizing
and privatizing urban space, violating human rights, and leaving legacies
of debt
and unfulfilled
promises. For those who can afford it, the party is fantastic. Once the
floodlights have burned out, the hangover
lasts for decades. In Brazil, the links between big business, big
government, and big sport are opaque and insidious, yet the connections to the
most recent FIFA-crisis are all too clear. Brazilian companies and executives
are in the spotlight, again, for all the wrong reasons.
The most surprising development is that it
has happened at all. Since 1974, FIFA and its (two) presidents have cozied up
to dictators and presidents, popes and prime-ministers, conferring upon
themselves all of the pomp, power, and impunity of a head of state. They have showered
riches upon themselves as the self-appointed stewards
of the game and like the Euro-aristocracy resident on Mt. Olympus, have made others rich in the process. The
complex systems of patronage and peonage that define FIFA´s political
philosophy are the same as those used by colonial powers. Big egos in white bodies (with apologies to Jack
Warner and Issa
Hayatu) rule this world by manufacturing consent through the distribution
of favours, suppressing dissent through the militarization of
urban space and the curtailment
of civil liberties, and choreographing their marionettes who, in accordance
with the Brazilian World Cup slogan, are “all in one rhythm.”
Predictably, it was from FIFA´s band of servile
minions - morbid troglodytes like Chuck Blazer, hyperbolic shysters like Jack
Warner, and half-arsed opportunists like Ricardo Texeira - that the tightly
wound FIFA-world began to unravel. Too much money flowing too quickly to the
wrong people though the wrong country for too long, coupled with the FBI´s
charming insouciance for the real-politik of global sporting affairs has
resulted in a very hard, very determined tug on a lot of rotten strings. Among
the unanswerable questions is, if it all unravels, will there be anything left of FIFA? Or rather, is
it reasonable to think that FIFA can disassociate from the same kinds of
oppression, violence, and injustice that define global consumer capitalism?
There has never been a period in the era of mass-communications when FIFA was
not corrupt, so how will it suddenly emerge? Will cutting off some heads of the
scabrous FIFA-Hydra change the nature of the beast? While behind the scenes
deals are being struck, these desperate attempts to consolidate power are
finally in conflict with an exasperated public, the FBI, and a thirsty press
corps. Somehow, despite the rot, we are still captivated by football.
As the events of the past weeks have
unfolded, the depth and extent of FIFA´s criminal network has become evident
even to casual observers. The sudden resignation of FIFA´s communications
officer, Walter de Gregorio (responsible for Blatter´s 2011 re-election
campaign), may be a sign that there is no message to deliver, no more damage
control to be done. It is almost impossible to keep track of the threads, but
some of the more intriguing are that:
- The Germans may have swapped
arms for a Saudia Ariabian vote to get the 2006 WC.
· - FIFA authorized a $10 million
USD bribe to then-CONCACAF president Jack Warner.
· - Jack Warner split this with his
deputy Chuck Blazer, who used the money to keep a Trump Tower apartment for his
cats.
· - The 2018 and 2022 WC votes were
bought, as were 1998, 2006, 2010, and 2014. The 2002 WC was not exempt, either,
but corruption allegations against corrupt officials were never pursued.
· - Nike, the Brazilian Football
Confederation, the ex-president of Barcelona, Sandro Rossell, and the Qatari
royal families have exchanged hundreds of millions of dollars between them.
· - FIFA paid the Irish FA 5
million Euros to not make noise about being wrongly disqualified from the 2010
WC.
· - All of the television
broadcasting rights contracts for the WC, as well as the Copa Libertadores,
Copa América, and other tournaments in Brazil, and much of South America, were
illicitly gained.
This list is far from comprehensive and
spans several modes of corruption, ones that affect governance, publicity, as
well as actual decisions on the field.
One hopes that in the coming months, the details will emerge to fill in
these categories. In the meantime, everything – from marketing contracts to penalty
decisions to hotel accommodations – is tainted with corruption.
Journalists and academics that report on and
research global sport had yet to touch the bottom of the fetid pool, but even
for us it still comes as somewhat of a surprise that the rest of the world can
now read about match-fixing,
illegal
transfers, human
trafficking, money
laundering, Swiss bank accounts, bribery, racketeering, falsification
of contracts, etc. as an integral part of the way football is organized.
With the recent politicization of labour rights for NCAA athletes, the banal
cruelty of playing a World Cup on turf, and the destruction of human life in
the NFL and its subsidiaries, perhaps there is a chance that sport and politics
will find a place in the public consciousness.
In reality, the FIFA saga is a
captivatingly complex morality play being acted out on a global stage with
curious twist: the chorus is hundreds of millions strong and may be able to influence
the plot. Will the hood-eyed prince, Michel Platini, make his move for the
presidency now? Will the court jester, Zico, show that he can perform better
than Texeira? Will Blatter actually leave or is he just circling the wagons? This is not about using sport as a force for good, or as FIFA
claims “developing football everywhere”. Sport is about power and we should be
aware that our places in the audience impact on its exercise.
We know World Cup games are bought and sold. We
know that the WWC
is being played on turf because football associations are on FIFA's leash
and have more power than the players. We know that thousands of kids are
trafficked across borders, sold into prostitution, or are molested, mistreated,
or die because of a
lack of medical attention. For every Dani Alves or Neymar, there are a
hundred thousand broken legs and a million broken dreams in Brazil alone. We
know of the bribery
behind World Cup bids, the illegal and blindingly idiotic stadium building
contracts, the militarization of cities for FIFA VIPs, dirty
billion dollar television contracts, institutionalized racism
and sexism,
and a never-ending series of lies, deceptions, and platitudes. There is no
“Fair Play” in or with FIFA.
As a reminder of how short our memories
are, it is nearly a year to the day that the 2014 World Cup kicked off in
Brazil. Of the twelve stadiums, in the twelve cities, ten are in serious
difficulty. The only two that are not going through financial and political turmoil
are the two built by clubs in Curitiba and Porto Alegre. Of all the football
associations implicated in the current FIFA hullabaloo, the Brazilian
federation is the most embroiled. The Brazilian João Havelange was FIFA´s
modern architect and his granddaughter an executive director of the 2014 World
Cup famously quipped about the R$ 30 billion outlay, “however much was spent,
or stolen, already has been” [so why worry?].
None of the “legacy” promises made by FIFA
has come to fruition in Brazil. On fleeing the country as protests erupted
around the Confederations´ Cup in 2013, Blatter announced a $ 100 million USD
“legacy fund”, that would be administered by the CBF. This is the Brazilian organization
recently run by a man now sitting in a Zurich jail house and currently headed
up by a man who fled Zurich and ran straight to Brasilia where he was honoured
by senators and congressmen. Of course, FIFA regulations prevent the
Brazilian government from interfering in CBF affairs, a position that is at
least consistent with the surrendering
of territorial sovereignty that comes with hosting the World Cup. This
takes the form of tax exemptions, restrictions on advertising, and the ability
to close any street in a host city, at any time, for any reason.
And now, as if to prove the point that the
Canadian World Cup doesn't matter, the Copa America kicks off in Chile, a
country with long and painful associations between football and politics. In
the same way we should remember those tortured and murdered in Santiago´s
National Stadium, we should also remember that the same people who organized,
broadcast, and advertise at this tournament are implicated in the shambolic
governance of football. The show goes on with the same delirious media
coverage, the same lack of critical reflection, the same people making more
money than ever. It may be that FIFA and football are beyond reform as long as
the crowds pour their money in and conform to FIFA's inexhaustible
list of prohibited behaviours. Is it possible that the global chorus of
football fans can only hope to sing their teams on to victory, while the
dark-suited protagonists squirrel away their millions? Can anything change if
we only watch the ball?
